Sports Attic - Trade Review Board
AHBL, HHBL, CSBL & BBBL
TRADE REVIEW BOARD REQUIREMENTS
Name | E-mail Address | Leagues Participating In | Active for 2005 season |
Dustin Adams |
BBBL |
yes | |
Zeke Ashton |
HHBL |
yes | |
Anthony Carpenter |
AHBL, CSBL, BBBL |
yes | |
Chris Erath |
CSBL |
yes | |
Joel Marques |
HHBL |
yes | |
Chuck McGranor |
HHBL, CSBL, AHBL |
yes | |
Constantine Piperis |
HHBL & AHBL |
yes | |
David Poirier |
CSBL |
yes | |
David Skalon |
BBBL & AHBL |
yes | |
Kevin Haury |
AHBL |
yes | |
Mike Taite |
HHBL, BBBL & CSBL |
yes | |
Jim Schacht |
BBBL |
yes | |
Hugo de la Sablonnière |
BBBL & AHBL |
yes |
TRADE REVIEW BOARD REQUIREMENTS:
1) Will be made up of the members listed above. I would use a combination of 4
different owners to review trades per transaction reviewed...trying to keep a voting member from
voting on a trade that is in HIS particular league (as much as possible). This would be done
to eliminate any bias that may exist by having an owner from the same league voting on a trade.
2) Would need to give the time and effort to review any trades brought before the
board. Would need knowledge of current player stats and future potential of players.
3) Would need to be dedicated; making fair judgments and offering opinions on why
trades were rejected OR how the trade could be made better for approval. If a review board
votes down a trade, they WILL BE REQUIRED to offer an explanation as to why.
HOW IT WORKS:
1) Trades will be made as normal. EACH trading party MUST enter their thoughts
on the deal in the COMMENT sections that are supplied on the trade page. (EX: maybe you want owners
to know that you are building for the future, etc). Basically, this will be your view
point as to why you made the deal. FUTURE DRAFT picks are NOT a consideration. All
leagues do not accept future draft picks in trading (per rules...EXCEPTION: if both parties pay
their league dues in advance, for the next season, future draft picks CAN be considered).
The trading of future draft picks are never to be allowed, under any
circumstances, be they informal or not. They will not be tracked nor
considered in the approval of trades.
2)When a trade is made in an individual league, I will send it out to the ENTIRE
league. League members have 24 hrs. to reply.
a) 10 or more league members
protest- TRADE DENIED
b) 4-9 league members protest- sent to review
board where 3 out of 4 contacted people must say no. If 4 trade review
members don't respond, then ask another member and put the board member on
notice. This will stop the review board member who says the trade is
lopsided but not enough to say no. Since it's all opinion, we need to have a
little leeway in the number needed for denial.
4) Review Board has 24 hours to research the deal and reply YES-APPROVE or
NO-REJECT to the deal (I would also REQUIRE feedback on a NO response).
FINAL COMMENTS:
I think this would give better due process to handling trades, plus, keep it objective by
having 4 owners from the different leagues making decisions on a trade. It would delay
accepting of trades by a minimum of 1 day and a max. of 2....but in my opinion, this is a short period of time and would give us a
consistent ruling body.